How on Earth can you have some 'depth' in your Elevations and Sections, while getting nice printed lines (screen or paper)?One way to overcome this is use masking region and change the transparency for the masking region. But the items closest to me (in my elevations/sections) are the same line thickness and the items WAY further back. If I want the nice crisp solid lines, I need to use vector. But thus.I lose my depth ability.ARRRRRRGGGHHHH!!!!!!! Yet the PDF (on screen and printed paper) looks very solid and crisp. Graphic Design software that does everything you need One powerful app for all your vector and raster graphics with unmatched versatility and value. And that PDF prints out terribly faded on paper.Ĭhanging to 'vector'.I suddenly lose the ability to have 'Depth Cueing'. As we explored in our vector graphics explained breakdown, vectors are graphics comprised of points, lines, and curves held together via mathematical equations, allowing them to be. By ameteni in forum Revit Architecture - General Replies: 7 Last Post:, 08:23 AM. And as soon as I do that, I get a VERY faded out PDF result. View Profile View Forum Posts I could stop if I wanted to Join Date. If I want to use 'Depth Cueing' for my Elevations (and Sections), I can only print as a raster. It would appear that my big issue is 'vector vs raster'. We're getting the 'Revit is going to use raster settings' warning box, but these details don't have shading, depth cueing, point clouds, gradients, or anything else that. We're printing sheets of details and some views are printing as raster images instead of vector, leading to inconsistent graphics. And I believe I figured out one part today. Unwanted raster printing - unknown reason. It's been some time - yet I'm still having issues with getting my drawings to print nicely.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |